Christian theology teaches the doctrine of prevenient
grace, which briefly stated means this, that before a man can seek God,
God must first have sought the man. Before
a sinful man can think a right thought of God, there must have been a
work of enlightenment done within him; imperfect it may be, but a true
work nonetheless, and the secret cause of all desiring and seeking and
praying which may follow.
We
pursue God because, and only because, He has first put an urge within
us that spurs us to the pursuit. “No man can come to me,’ said our
Lord, ‘except the Father which hath sent me draw him,” and it is by
this very prevenient drawing that God takes from us every vestige of
credit for the act of coming. The impulse
to pursue God originates with God, but the outworking of that impulse
is our following hard after Him; and all the time we are pursuing Him
we are already in His hand: “Thy right hand upholdeth me.” In
this divine “upholding” and human “following” there is no contradiction. All is of God, for as von Hugel teaches, God
is always previous.
In practice, however, (that is, where God’s previous
working meets man’s present response) man must pursue God.
On our part there must be positive reciprocation if this
secret drawing of God is to eventuate in identifiable experience of the
Divine. In the warm language of personal
feeling this is stated in the Forty-second Psalm: “As the hart panteth
after the waterbrooks, so panteth my soul after thee, O God. My soul
thirsteth for God, for the living God: when shall I come and appear
before God?” This is deep calling unto
deep, and the longing heart will understand it.
The doctrine of justification by faith—a Biblical truth,
and a blessed relief from sterile legalism and unavailing
self-effort—has in our time fallen into evil company and been
interpreted by many in such manner as actually to bar men from the
knowledge of God. The whole transaction of
religious conversion has been made mechanical and spiritless. Faith may now be exercised without a jar to
the moral life and without embarrassment to the Adamic ego. Christ may be “received” without creating any
special love for Him in the soul of the receiver. The
man is “saved,” but he is not hungry nor thirsty after God. In fact he is specifically taught to be
satisfied and encouraged to be content with little.
The modern scientist has lost God amid the wonders of His
world; we Christians are in real danger of losing God amid the wonders
of His Word. We have almost forgotten that
God is a Person and, as such, can be cultivated as any person can. It is inherent in personality to be able to
know other personalities, but full knowledge of one personality by
another cannot be achieved in one encounter. It is only after long and
loving mental intercourse that the full possibilities of both can be
explored.
All
social intercourse between human beings is a response of personality to
personality, grading upward from the most casual brush between man and
man to the fullest, most intimate communion of which the human soul is
capable. Religion, so far as it is
genuine, is in essence the response of created personalities to the
Creating Personality, God. “This is life
eternal, that they might know thee, the only true God, and Jesus
Christ, whom thou hast sent” (John 17:3).
God
is a Person, and in the deep of His mighty nature He thinks, wills,
enjoys feels, loves, desires and suffers as any other person may. In making Himself known to us He stays by the
familiar pattern of personality. He
communicates with us through the avenues of our minds, our wills and
our emotions. The continuous and
unembarrassed interchange of love and thought between God and the soul
of the redeemed man is the throbbing heart of New Testament religion.
This
intercourse between God and the soul is known to us in conscious
personal awareness. It is personal: that
is, it does not come through the body of believers, as such, but is
known to the individual, and to the body through the individuals which
compose it. And it is conscious: that is,
it does not stay below the threshold of consciousness and work there
unknown to the soul (as, for instance, infant baptism is thought by
some to do), but comes within the field of awareness where the man can
‘know’ it as he knows any other fact of experience.